Electricity Balancing

Current Status
Awaiting validation by EU Member States

Making the code a reality

Explore

The TSOs of the EXPLORE countries – Austria, Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands – have been studying the possibility of integrating their FRR energy markets in the scope of the requirements of the draft guidelines of electricity balancing.

View

Imbalance Netting

TSOs have started Imbalance Netting cooperation with focus on the pilot projects “International Grid Control Cooperation” (IGCC), “e-GCC” and the “Imbalance Netting Cooperation” (INC).

View

Cross Border Electricity Balancing Pilot Projects

Pilot projects to lay out the processes for developing market based co-operation and implementing the steps towards regional and European integration

View

European Stakeholder Committees

ARCHIVED CONTENT FROM CURRENT SITE

Below you will find the Frequently asked questions relating to the network code Electricity Balancing.

Electricity Balancing is one of the key roles of Transmission System Operators where they act to ensure that generation equals demand in real time. This is vital for ensuring security of supply and has an important bearing on costs to customers. The potential for balancing resources to be effectively shared between countries can enhance security of supply and reduce cost, hence there is a strong rationale for developing cross border balancing markets. The network code on Electricity Balancing will ensure that the correct framework will be put in place for this to happen.

Latest Update (December 2016)

An updated draft of the Electricity Balancing guidelines will be discussed in the next electricity cross-border committee. Use the link below to view the EC draft version sent to the electricity cross-border committee in October 2016.

Read More

December 2015

On 22 July 2015, the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators, ACER, recommended the Network Code on Electricity Balancing for adoption. On 23 December 2013, ENTSO-E delivered the Network Code on Electricity Balancing (NC EB) and Supporting Document to the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER). ACER provided its reasoned opinion on the Network Code on 23 March 2014.

ENTSO-E studied the reasoned opinion in detail. On 16 September ENTSO-E submitted a new version of NC EB, together with explanatory documents. Based on this resubmission, ACER issued a recommendation to adopt the code, along with amendments proposals. With a few exceptions, the NC EB is perfectly in line with the Framework Guidelines on Electricity Balancing. These exceptions, such as the implementation deadline for the European integration model, are motivated by ENTSO-E members experience as grid operators, and by their commitment to delivering ambitious but realistic codes.

The NC EB is a crucial piece of work that will greatly enhance Europe’s security of supply. By harmonising electricity balancing rules, trading of balancing resources between European TSOs will be facilitated; leading to a more efficient use of resources available, a reduction of costs and an increase in security of supply.

Given the complexity of balancing, its key role in European security of supply, and the low level of current European harmonisation, the NC EB is one of the most forward looking and ambitious network code so far.

ENTSO-E would like to thank all stakeholders who provided valuable contributions to the process, as well as colleagues from the European Commission, ACER and National Regulatory Authorities for the constructive cooperation during the development of NC EB.

The documents are available for download in the Related Documents and Links section below.

What Happens Next?

The Network Code will now be prepared by experts from the European Commission before it enters the Comitology process, through which it should become European law. ENTSO-E will assist both ACER and the European Commission in any way throughout this process in order to contribute to a smooth adoption.

Early implementation

Network codes need to be finalised and adopted by Member States, and are therefore expected to evolve over time. TSOs have however decided to begin the early implementation of a number of projects, as suggested by regulators. This will contribute to faster delivery of the IEM. ENTSO-E has proposed several cross border pilot projects with the purpose of:

  • Testing the feasibility of the European (target) model and intermediate steps established in the ACER Framework Guidelines on Electricity Balancing (FG EB);
  • Evaluating the associated implementation impact;
  • Reporting on the experience gained.

More information at Cross Border Electricity Balancing Pilot Projects.

ENTSO-E also started working on other aspects of the ambitious path towards harmonised balancing markets in Europe. In March 2015, ENTSO-E launched a public consultation on the methodology for Cost Benefit Analysis.

Public Consultation on draft Network Code on Electricity Balancing

From 16 June to 16 August 2013, ENTSO-E held a public consultation on the draft Network Code on Electricity Balancing (NC EB). By the end of the nine-week consultation period, more than 40 stakeholders had submitted a total of 2178 individual comments via the web-based consultation tool.

Stakeholder Engagement

ENTSO-E’s stakeholder engagement comprises of Stakeholder Advisory Group Meetings and Public Stakeholder Workshops, as well as ad-hoc meetings and exchange of views with any interested party as appropriate. The Electricity Balancing Stakeholder Advisory Group (EBSAG) members represent all relevant parts of the industry as well as consumers, to enable efficient and effective discussion on the process and content of the Network Code on Electricity Balancing. The EBSAG member organisation list may be viewed here and the Terms of Reference here.

ENTSO-E has hosted a total of four EBSAG meetings and three public stakeholder workshops on the NC EB. The latest public workshop was held in Brussels on 23 October to present and discuss the feedback received during the public consultation. This also served as an opportunity to discuss the changes made to the code in response to stakeholder feedback.

All material, including minutes and presentations from meetings are made public.

Frequently asked questions

Answers to all your questions nicely grouped by topic.

INTRODUCING THE NETWORK CODE

There are two dimensions to electricity balancing: balancing energy and balancing reserves.

Balancing energy is provided close to real time by balancing services providers (BSPs), normally by bidding in a balancing market. Almost any party can be a BSP – with small-scale generation, demand side response, renewable resources and intermittent resources all capable of providing balancing services.

However, due to the risk that BSPs may not be able to provide sufficient balancing energy in real time, transmission system operators (TSOs) can ensure resources are available by securing “balancing reserves”.  Balancing reserves are secured, normally via contracts, ahead of real time and can be activated either automatically or manually to balance the system in real time.

The Network Code on Electricity Balancing (NC EB) deals with both of these dimensions.

Balancing, at is simplest, is ensuring that the amount of energy produced (generated) is equal to the amount used (consumed) at each point in time. This is done by monitoring the frequency of the transmission grid (which is covered in the NC LFCR) and taking actions to alter the generation or demand on the system (for example increasing/decreasing the amount generated or decreasing/increasing the amount consumed). This is electricity balancing.

CROSS BORDER BALANCING MARKETS

The development and integration of the European electricity market follows clear target models in all areas except balancing. For this reason, the NC EB sets out a clear series of steps, which over the course of six years will see balancing markets grow from their current relatively underdeveloped state to first a set of regional markets and later a pan-European market.

This pragmatic, incremental approach will allow all involved to gain and share experience and to take steps forward at the right time, based on a consideration of what is best for the market and for system security. This will make for more robust and effective long-term solutions, more competition and lower overall costs of balancing the European electricity transmission system.

There are several examples of cross-border balancing markets in Europe today, although those examples are very different and tend not to cover multiple countries.  Therefore, European balancing markets are at a very early stage of development in most places. The exception is the Nordic region where the four countries share balancing resources in a single market.

Some balancing schemes have been developed in recent years, including the Grid Control Cooperation initiative, which operates in Germany and several neighbouring countries;  and the BALIT initiative, which involves Great Britain and France. Other mechanisms are under development in other parts of Europe.  These schemes will act as pilot projects, allowing experience to be gained and best practice to be shared.

European Member States do need to ensure that their electricity systems are secure.  However, if they choose to achieve this objective using only national resources, the costs are likely to be greater and the risks may be higher than if the combined European resources are used.  Each country has a specific set of characteristics, based on history or geography, and there are significant opportunities for mutually beneficial outcomes from pooling these resources.

For example, one of the reasons that Denmark can integrate so much wind energy securely is its access to balancing power from the hydro resources in Norway. Therefore, common European balancing markets can put downward pressure on costs and enhance security of supply.

BENEFITS OF THE CODE

A key part of the NC EB is that it creates a level playing field for all potential providers of balancing services, including demand side response and intermittent sources, and introduces a standardised set of rules. Anyone will be able to offer to provide balancing resources with the most cost effective offers being used by the transmission system operators (TSOs).

The NC EB will encourage a greater number of parties to offer balancing services, which will in turn create larger and more competitive balancing markets.  A recent study for the European Commission indicates a saving of €100m per year by 2015 from sharing balancing reserves.  This benefit is estimated at between €300m and €500m per year by 20301.

REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE CODE

The Network Code on Electricity Balancing (NC EB) covers all aspects of the balancing market. The NC EB provides a framework for the continuous integration of national balancing markets to regional and pan-European markets. It does so by establishing rules on how transmission system operators (TSOs) procure balancing services, how these services are activated, shared and exchanged across borders and how TSOs obtain the necessary cross border transmission capacity.

As this exchange of balancing services entails a financial flow between providers, the code also creates the rules on how these services are financially settled, both between TSOs and with balancing service providers and balance responsible parties, to ensure a level playing field for all market participants.

Transmission system operators across most of Europe mainly use three categories of reserves to keep the grid balanced - primary, secondary and tertiary reserves.

The Network Code on Electricity Balancing (NC EB) sets out rules for the procurment, exchange, activation and settlement of three types of secondary and tertiary reserves. These three types - manually activated Frequency Restoration Reserves, automatically activated Frequency Restoration Reserves and Replacement Reserves - differ predominantly in the way they are activated (manually or automatically) and in the activation time and duration.

More information on the reserve types can be found in the Network Code on Load Frequency Control & Reserves section